linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] i2c: busses: tegra: Add suspend-resume support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f5adcda-49e3-46b3-9881-bc33532db4df@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:16:13 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@...dia.com>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shardar Mohammed <smohammed@...dia.com>,
        Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        Mantravadi Karthik <mkarthik@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] i2c: busses: tegra: Add suspend-resume support

17.06.2019 10:02, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 04:56:06PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 15.06.2019 7:54, Wolfram Sang пишет:
>>>
>>>>> Without a maintainer ack, this is an exception this time. Should we add
>>>>> Dmitry as another maintainer or reviewer at least?
>>>>>
>>>> I shall followup with Maintainer for ACK in future I2C tegra patches.
>>>
>>> This comment was not directed at you, sorry if that was not clear. It
>>> was more for Laxman, Thierry, Jonathan, and Dmitry (if he is
>>> interested).
>>>
>>
>> I don't mind at all to review and test patches for the driver and can propose myself
>> as a reviewer if that helps and if there are no objections from the Tegra maintainers.
>> My primary interest is to have my devices working after next kernel update, but I also
>> like to review patches in general if they are touching area that I'm familiar with.
> 
> No objection from me.

Thanks! I guess the same from Laxman and Jon?

I'll prepare the patch to add myself as a reviewer.