[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190617130150.GA21113@amd>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:01:51 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...gle.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Alexandru Stan <amstan@...gle.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] backlight: pwm_bl: compute brightness of LED
linearly to human eye.
Hi!
> > Certainly "linear" (this device will work more or less correctly if the
> > userspace applies perceptual curves). Not sure about logarithmic since
> > what is actually useful is something that is "perceptually linear"
> > (logarithmic is merely a way to approximate that).
> >
> > I do wonder about a compatible string like most-detailed to
> > least-detailed description. This for a PWM with the auto-generated
> > tables we'd see something like:
> >
> > cie-1991,perceptual,non-linear
> >
> > For something that is non-linear but we are not sure what its tables are
> > we can offer just "non-linear".
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> It seems clear that we want a string for the added flexibility. I can
> work on a patch with the compatible string like description you
> suggested and we can discuss in the review if we want to go with that
> or prefer something else.
Compatible-like string seems overly complicated.
> > Instead one valid value for the sysfs should be "unknown" and this be
> > the default for drivers we have not analysed (this also makes it easy to
> > introduce change here).
>
> An "unknown" value sounds good, it allows userspace to just do what it
> did/would hace done before this attribute existed.
What about simply not presenting the attribute when we don't have the
information?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists