linux-kernel - [PATCH] lib: test_meminit: fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190617131210.2190280-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:11:57 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...roid.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] lib: test_meminit: fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positive

The conditional logic is too complicated for the compiler to
fully comprehend:

lib/test_meminit.c: In function 'test_meminit_init':
lib/test_meminit.c:236:5: error: 'buf_copy' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
     kfree(buf_copy);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_meminit.c:201:14: note: 'buf_copy' was declared here

Simplify it by splitting out the non-rcu section.

Fixes: af734ee6ec85 ("lib: introduce test_meminit module")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
 lib/test_meminit.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_meminit.c b/lib/test_meminit.c
index ed7efec1387b..7ae2183ff1f4 100644
--- a/lib/test_meminit.c
+++ b/lib/test_meminit.c
@@ -208,35 +208,37 @@ static int __init do_kmem_cache_size(size_t size, bool want_ctor,
 		/* Check that buf is zeroed, if it must be. */
 		fail = check_buf(buf, size, want_ctor, want_rcu, want_zero);
 		fill_with_garbage_skip(buf, size, want_ctor ? CTOR_BYTES : 0);
+
+		if (!want_rcu) {
+			kmem_cache_free(c, buf);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * If this is an RCU cache, use a critical section to ensure we
 		 * can touch objects after they're freed.
 		 */
-		if (want_rcu) {
-			rcu_read_lock();
-			/*
-			 * Copy the buffer to check that it's not wiped on
-			 * free().
-			 */
-			buf_copy = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-			if (buf_copy)
-				memcpy(buf_copy, buf, size);
-		}
-		kmem_cache_free(c, buf);
-		if (want_rcu) {
-			/*
-			 * Check that |buf| is intact after kmem_cache_free().
-			 * |want_zero| is false, because we wrote garbage to
-			 * the buffer already.
-			 */
-			fail |= check_buf(buf, size, want_ctor, want_rcu,
-					  false);
-			if (buf_copy) {
-				fail |= (bool)memcmp(buf, buf_copy, size);
-				kfree(buf_copy);
-			}
-			rcu_read_unlock();
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		/*
+		 * Copy the buffer to check that it's not wiped on
+		 * free().
+		 */
+		buf_copy = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (buf_copy)
+			memcpy(buf_copy, buf, size);
+
+		/*
+		 * Check that |buf| is intact after kmem_cache_free().
+		 * |want_zero| is false, because we wrote garbage to
+		 * the buffer already.
+		 */
+		fail |= check_buf(buf, size, want_ctor, want_rcu,
+				  false);
+		if (buf_copy) {
+			fail |= (bool)memcmp(buf, buf_copy, size);
+			kfree(buf_copy);
 		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 	kmem_cache_destroy(c);
 
-- 
2.20.0