[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab346931-1d1b-bd2f-8314-ee4779bd44bf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:31:21 +0200
From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>
To: Jaskaran Khurana <jaskarankhurana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com, dm-devel@...hat.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, scottsh@...rosoft.com, ebiggers@...gle.com,
mpatocka@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/1] Add dm verity root hash pkcs7 sig validation.
On 13/06/2019 03:06, Jaskaran Khurana wrote:
...
> Adds DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG_FORCE: roothash signature *must* be
> specified for all dm verity volumes and verification must succeed prior
> to creation of device mapper block device.
I had a quick discussion about this and one suggestion was
to add dm-verity kernel module parameter instead of a new config option.
The idea is that if you can control kernel boot commandline, you can add it
there with the same effect (expecting that root device is on dm-verity as well).
Isn't this better option or it is not going to work for you?
Milan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists