linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl: mark vdd1/2 as continuous on twl4030

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190617183225.1210c91c@aktux>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:32:25 +0200
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     tony@...mide.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, nm@...com, vireshk@...nel.org,
        letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl: mark vdd1/2 as continuous on twl4030

On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:40:48 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:03:57PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:  
> > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 06:33:14PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:  
> 
> > > Why is this a good fix and not defining the supported voltages?  These
> > > look like fairly standard linear range regulators.  
> 
> > I am fixing the definition of the two regulators in the patch.
> > I am defining them as continuous. 
> > Voltage ranges are defined in
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi
> > Only the continuous flag is missing.  
> 
> > Is there anything else do you want to be defined?  
> 
> These regulators are not continuous regulators as far as I can see, they
> are normal linear range regulators and so should have their voltages
> enumerable like any other linear range regulator.

another thing which might be misleading: The patch belongs to the
section after
#define TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(label, offset, num, turnon_delay, remap_conf)

that might be easily misread (because of too less context in the diff),
or if line numbers change.
It is *not* for
#define TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, num, turnon_delay, remap_conf)

Regards,
Andreas