linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] scsi: add a host / host template field for the virt boundary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVOwCeM2JzefBpKsVZrEaWpSBR0DF8qp4oKfoHm+pwLBYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:35:21 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] scsi: add a host / host template field for the virt boundary

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:21 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> This allows drivers setting it up easily instead of branching out to
> block layer calls in slave_alloc, and ensures the upgraded
> max_segment_size setting gets picked up by the DMA layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/hosts.c     | 3 +++
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c  | 3 ++-
>  include/scsi/scsi_host.h | 3 +++
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> index ff0d8c6a8d0c..55522b7162d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> @@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize)
>         else
>                 shost->dma_boundary = 0xffffffff;
>
> +       if (sht->virt_boundary_mask)
> +               shost->virt_boundary_mask = sht->virt_boundary_mask;
> +
>         device_initialize(&shost->shost_gendev);
>         dev_set_name(&shost->shost_gendev, "host%d", shost->host_no);
>         shost->shost_gendev.bus = &scsi_bus_type;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 65d0a10c76ad..d333bb6b1c59 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1775,7 +1775,8 @@ void __scsi_init_queue(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct request_queue *q)
>         dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary);
>
>         blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, shost->max_segment_size);
> -       dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, shost->max_segment_size);
> +       blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, shost->virt_boundary_mask);
> +       dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, queue_max_segment_size(q));

The patch looks fine, also suggest to make sure that max_segment_size
is block-size aligned, and un-aligned max segment size has caused trouble
on mmc.

Thanks,
Ming Lei