[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hpWg5DWRhazS-ftyghiZP-J_M-7Vd5tiUd5UKONOib8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 23:44:34 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] resource: find_next_iomem_res() improvements
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:59 PM Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> wrote:
>
> Running some microbenchmarks on dax keeps showing find_next_iomem_res()
> as a place in which significant amount of time is spent. It appears that
> in order to determine the cacheability that is required for the PTE,
> lookup_memtype() is called, and this one traverses the resources list in
> an inefficient manner. This patch-set tries to improve this situation.
Let's just do this lookup once per device, cache that, and replay it
to modified vmf_insert_* routines that trust the caller to already
know the pgprot_values.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists