[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efc38197-f846-142d-fbaf-93327c2669c9@web.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:37:31 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Subject: Re: drivers: Inline code in devm_platform_ioremap_resource() from two
functions
>> Two function calls were combined in this function implementation.
>> Inline corresponding code so that extra error checks can be avoided here.
>
> What exactly is the purpose of this ?
I suggest to take another look at the need and relevance of involved
error checks in the discussed function combination.
> Looks like a notable code duplication ...
This can be.
> I thought we usually try to reduce this, instead of introducing new ones.
Would you like to check the software circumstances once more
for the generation of a similar code structure by a C compiler
(or optimiser)?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists