| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:49:30 +0200
From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] s390: vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP
resources to mdev device
On 17.06.19 17:07, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 6/17/19 6:05 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
>> On 13.06.19 21:39, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>> The AP architecture does not preclude assignment of AP resources that are
>>> not available. Let's go ahead and implement this facet of the AP
>>> architecture for linux guests.
>>>
>>> The current implementation does not allow assignment of AP adapters or
>>> domains to an mdev device if the APQNs resulting from the assignment
>>> reference AP queue devices that are not bound to the vfio_ap device
>>> driver. This patch allows assignment of AP resources to the mdev device as
>>> long as the APQNs resulting from the assignment are not reserved by the AP
>>> BUS for use by the zcrypt device drivers and the APQNs are not assigned to
>>> another mdev device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 231 ++++++++------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>>> index 60efd3d7896d..9db86c0db52e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>>> @@ -406,122 +406,6 @@ static struct attribute_group *vfio_ap_mdev_type_groups[] = {
>>> NULL,
>>> };
>>> -struct vfio_ap_queue_reserved {
>>> - unsigned long *apid;
>>> - unsigned long *apqi;
>>> - bool reserved;
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -/**
>>> - * vfio_ap_has_queue
>>> - *
>>> - * @dev: an AP queue device
>>> - * @data: a struct vfio_ap_queue_reserved reference
>>> - *
>>> - * Flags whether the AP queue device (@dev) has a queue ID containing the APQN,
>>> - * apid or apqi specified in @data:
>>> - *
>>> - * - If @data contains both an apid and apqi value, then @data will be flagged
>>> - * as reserved if the APID and APQI fields for the AP queue device matches
>>> - *
>>> - * - If @data contains only an apid value, @data will be flagged as
>>> - * reserved if the APID field in the AP queue device matches
>>> - *
>>> - * - If @data contains only an apqi value, @data will be flagged as
>>> - * reserved if the APQI field in the AP queue device matches
>>> - *
>>> - * Returns 0 to indicate the input to function succeeded. Returns -EINVAL if
>>> - * @data does not contain either an apid or apqi.
>>> - */
>>> -static int vfio_ap_has_queue(struct device *dev, void *data)
>>> -{
>>> - struct vfio_ap_queue_reserved *qres = data;
>>> - struct ap_queue *ap_queue = to_ap_queue(dev);
>>> - ap_qid_t qid;
>>> - unsigned long id;
>>> -
>>> - if (qres->apid && qres->apqi) {
>>> - qid = AP_MKQID(*qres->apid, *qres->apqi);
>>> - if (qid == ap_queue->qid)
>>> - qres->reserved = true;
>>> - } else if (qres->apid && !qres->apqi) {
>>> - id = AP_QID_CARD(ap_queue->qid);
>>> - if (id == *qres->apid)
>>> - qres->reserved = true;
>>> - } else if (!qres->apid && qres->apqi) {
>>> - id = AP_QID_QUEUE(ap_queue->qid);
>>> - if (id == *qres->apqi)
>>> - qres->reserved = true;
>>> - } else {
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -/**
>>> - * vfio_ap_verify_queue_reserved
>>> - *
>>> - * @matrix_dev: a mediated matrix device
>>> - * @apid: an AP adapter ID
>>> - * @apqi: an AP queue index
>>> - *
>>> - * Verifies that the AP queue with @apid/@...i is reserved by the VFIO AP device
>>> - * driver according to the following rules:
>>> - *
>>> - * - If both @apid and @apqi are not NULL, then there must be an AP queue
>>> - * device bound to the vfio_ap driver with the APQN identified by @apid and
>>> - * @apqi
>>> - *
>>> - * - If only @apid is not NULL, then there must be an AP queue device bound
>>> - * to the vfio_ap driver with an APQN containing @apid
>>> - *
>>> - * - If only @apqi is not NULL, then there must be an AP queue device bound
>>> - * to the vfio_ap driver with an APQN containing @apqi
>>> - *
>>> - * Returns 0 if the AP queue is reserved; otherwise, returns -EADDRNOTAVAIL.
>>> - */
>>> -static int vfio_ap_verify_queue_reserved(unsigned long *apid,
>>> - unsigned long *apqi)
>>> -{
>>> - int ret;
>>> - struct vfio_ap_queue_reserved qres;
>>> -
>>> - qres.apid = apid;
>>> - qres.apqi = apqi;
>>> - qres.reserved = false;
>>> -
>>> - ret = driver_for_each_device(&matrix_dev->vfio_ap_drv->driver, NULL,
>>> - &qres, vfio_ap_has_queue);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - return ret;
>>> -
>>> - if (qres.reserved)
>>> - return 0;
>>> -
>>> - return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static int
>>> -vfio_ap_mdev_verify_queues_reserved_for_apid(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
>>> - unsigned long apid)
>>> -{
>>> - int ret;
>>> - unsigned long apqi;
>>> - unsigned long nbits = matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm_max + 1;
>>> -
>>> - if (find_first_bit_inv(matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm, nbits) >= nbits)
>>> - return vfio_ap_verify_queue_reserved(&apid, NULL);
>>> -
>>> - for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm, nbits) {
>>> - ret = vfio_ap_verify_queue_reserved(&apid, &apqi);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - return ret;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /**
>>> * vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing
>>> *
>>> @@ -529,18 +413,26 @@ vfio_ap_mdev_verify_queues_reserved_for_apid(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
>>> * and AP queue indexes comprising the AP matrix are not configured for another
>>> * mediated device. AP queue sharing is not allowed.
>>> *
>>> - * @matrix_mdev: the mediated matrix device
>>> + * @mdev_apm: the mask identifying the adapters assigned to mdev
>>> + * @mdev_apm: the mask identifying the adapters assigned to mdev
>> I assume you wanted to write @mdev_aqm ... queues ... at the 2nd line.
>
> You assumed correctly. I also mean to say "domains assigned to mdev".
>
>>> *
>>> * Returns 0 if the APQNs are not shared, otherwise; returns -EADDRINUSE.
>>> */
>>> -static int vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
>>> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(unsigned long *mdev_apm,
>>> + unsigned long *mdev_aqm)
>>> {
>>> struct ap_matrix_mdev *lstdev;
>>> DECLARE_BITMAP(apm, AP_DEVICES);
>>> DECLARE_BITMAP(aqm, AP_DOMAINS);
>>> list_for_each_entry(lstdev, &matrix_dev->mdev_list, node) {
>>> - if (matrix_mdev == lstdev)
>>> + /*
>>> + * If either of the input masks belongs to the mdev to which an
>>> + * AP resource is being assigned, then we don't need to verify
>>> + * that mdev's masks.
>>> + */
>>> + if ((mdev_apm == lstdev->matrix.apm) ||
>>> + (mdev_aqm == lstdev->matrix.aqm))
>>> continue;
>>> memset(apm, 0, sizeof(apm));
>>> @@ -550,12 +442,10 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
>>> * We work on full longs, as we can only exclude the leftover
>>> * bits in non-inverse order. The leftover is all zeros.
>>> */
>>> - if (!bitmap_and(apm, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm,
>>> - lstdev->matrix.apm, AP_DEVICES))
>>> + if (!bitmap_and(apm, mdev_apm, lstdev->matrix.apm, AP_DEVICES))
>>> continue;
>>> - if (!bitmap_and(aqm, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm,
>>> - lstdev->matrix.aqm, AP_DOMAINS))
>>> + if (!bitmap_and(aqm, mdev_aqm, lstdev->matrix.aqm, AP_DOMAINS))
>>> continue;
>>> return -EADDRINUSE;
>>> @@ -564,6 +454,17 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_validate_masks(unsigned long *apm, unsigned long *aqm)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv(apm, aqm);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return (ret == 1) ? -EADDRNOTAVAIL : ret;
>>> +
>>> + return vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(apm, aqm);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * assign_adapter_store
>>> *
>>> @@ -602,6 +503,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_adapter_store(struct device *dev,
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> unsigned long apid;
>>> + DECLARE_BITMAP(apm, AP_DEVICES);
>>> struct mdev_device *mdev = mdev_from_dev(dev);
>>> struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
>>> @@ -616,32 +518,19 @@ static ssize_t assign_adapter_store(struct device *dev,
>>> if (apid > matrix_mdev->matrix.apm_max)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> - /*
>>> - * Set the bit in the AP mask (APM) corresponding to the AP adapter
>>> - * number (APID). The bits in the mask, from most significant to least
>>> - * significant bit, correspond to APIDs 0-255.
>>> - */
>>> - mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> -
>>> - ret = vfio_ap_mdev_verify_queues_reserved_for_apid(matrix_mdev, apid);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - goto done;
>>> + memset(apm, 0, ARRAY_SIZE(apm) * sizeof(*apm));
>> What about just memset(apm, 0, sizeof(apm));
>
> apm is a pointer to an array of unsigned long, so sizeof(apm) will
> yield the number of bytes in the pointer (8), not the number of bytes in
> the array (32); or am I wrong about that?
The
DECLARE_BITMAP(apm, AP_DEVICES);
with the macro definition in types.h:
#define DECLARE_BITMAP(name,bits) \
unsigned long name[BITS_TO_LONGS(bits)]
gives this expanded code:
unsigned long apm[BITS_TO_LONGS(AP_DEVICES)];
which is an ordinary unsigned long array.
So sizeof(apm) gives the size of the array in bytes:
sizeof(apm) = 32
I know this is weird, but it is common practice.
Funnily look at this code:
int blubber[10];
int *ptr = blubber;
sizeof(blubber) gives 10*sizeof(int) but
sizeof(ptr) gives the size of the pointer pointing to
the blubber array.
>
>>> + set_bit_inv(apid, apm);
>>> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_validate_masks(apm, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> set_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm);
>>> -
>>> - ret = vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(matrix_mdev);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - goto share_err;
>>> -
>>> - ret = count;
>>> - goto done;
>>> -
>>> -share_err:
>>> - clear_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm);
>>> -done:
>>> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> - return ret;
>>> + return count;
>>> }
>>> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(assign_adapter);
>>> @@ -690,26 +579,6 @@ static ssize_t unassign_adapter_store(struct device *dev,
>>> }
>>> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(unassign_adapter);
>>> -static int
>>> -vfio_ap_mdev_verify_queues_reserved_for_apqi(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
>>> - unsigned long apqi)
>>> -{
>>> - int ret;
>>> - unsigned long apid;
>>> - unsigned long nbits = matrix_mdev->matrix.apm_max + 1;
>>> -
>>> - if (find_first_bit_inv(matrix_mdev->matrix.apm, nbits) >= nbits)
>>> - return vfio_ap_verify_queue_reserved(NULL, &apqi);
>>> -
>>> - for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm, nbits) {
>>> - ret = vfio_ap_verify_queue_reserved(&apid, &apqi);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - return ret;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /**
>>> * assign_domain_store
>>> *
>>> @@ -748,6 +617,7 @@ static ssize_t assign_domain_store(struct device *dev,
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> unsigned long apqi;
>>> + DECLARE_BITMAP(aqm, AP_DEVICES);
>> AP_DEVICES -> AP_DOMAINS
>
> Copy and paste error, it should be AP_DOMAINS.
>
>>> struct mdev_device *mdev = mdev_from_dev(dev);
>>> struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
>>> unsigned long max_apqi = matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm_max;
>>> @@ -762,27 +632,19 @@ static ssize_t assign_domain_store(struct device *dev,
>>> if (apqi > max_apqi)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> - mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> -
>>> - ret = vfio_ap_mdev_verify_queues_reserved_for_apqi(matrix_mdev, apqi);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - goto done;
>>> + memset(aqm, 0, ARRAY_SIZE(aqm) * sizeof(*aqm));
>> memset(aqm, 0, sizeof(aqm));
>
> See response above.
>
>>> + set_bit_inv(apqi, aqm);
>>> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_validate_masks(matrix_mdev->matrix.apm, aqm);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm);
>>> -
>>> - ret = vfio_ap_mdev_verify_no_sharing(matrix_mdev);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - goto share_err;
>>> -
>>> - ret = count;
>>> - goto done;
>>> -
>>> -share_err:
>>> - clear_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm);
>>> -done:
>>> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> - return ret;
>>> + return count;
>>> }
>>> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(assign_domain);
>>> @@ -868,11 +730,6 @@ static ssize_t assign_control_domain_store(struct device *dev,
>>> if (id > matrix_mdev->matrix.adm_max)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> - /* Set the bit in the ADM (bitmask) corresponding to the AP control
>>> - * domain number (id). The bits in the mask, from most significant to
>>> - * least significant, correspond to IDs 0 up to the one less than the
>>> - * number of control domains that can be assigned.
>>> - */
>>> mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>> set_bit_inv(id, matrix_mdev->matrix.adm);
>>> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists