[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618062423.GA24549@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:24:23 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf trace: Use pr_debug() instead of fprintf() for
logging
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:24:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 05:11:39PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > In the function trace__syscall_info(), it explicitly checks verbose
> > level and print out log with fprintf(). Actually, we can use
> > pr_debug() to do the same thing for debug logging.
> >
> > This patch uses pr_debug() instead of fprintf() for debug logging; it
> > includes a minor fixing for 'space before tab in indent', which
> > dismisses git warning when apply it.
>
> But those are not fprintf(stdout,), they explicitely redirect to the
> output file that the user may have specified using 'perf trace --output
> filename.trace' :-)
Thanks for pointing out, sorry for noise. Please drop this patch.
Thanks,
Leo Yan
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > index bd1f00e7a2eb..5cd74651db4c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > @@ -1760,12 +1760,11 @@ static struct syscall *trace__syscall_info(struct trace *trace,
> > * grep "NR -1 " /t/trace_pipe
> > *
> > * After generating some load on the machine.
> > - */
> > - if (verbose > 1) {
> > - static u64 n;
> > - fprintf(trace->output, "Invalid syscall %d id, skipping (%s, %" PRIu64 ") ...\n",
> > - id, perf_evsel__name(evsel), ++n);
> > - }
> > + */
> > + static u64 n;
> > +
> > + pr_debug("Invalid syscall %d id, skipping (%s, %" PRIu64 ")\n",
> > + id, perf_evsel__name(evsel), ++n);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1779,12 +1778,10 @@ static struct syscall *trace__syscall_info(struct trace *trace,
> > return &trace->syscalls.table[id];
> >
> > out_cant_read:
> > - if (verbose > 0) {
> > - fprintf(trace->output, "Problems reading syscall %d", id);
> > - if (id <= trace->syscalls.max && trace->syscalls.table[id].name != NULL)
> > - fprintf(trace->output, "(%s)", trace->syscalls.table[id].name);
> > - fputs(" information\n", trace->output);
> > - }
> > + pr_debug("Problems reading syscall %d", id);
> > + if (id <= trace->syscalls.max && trace->syscalls.table[id].name != NULL)
> > + pr_debug("(%s)", trace->syscalls.table[id].name);
> > + pr_debug(" information\n");
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists