[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618090031.GK9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:00:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thloh@...era.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, grygorii.strashko@...com,
ssantosh@...nel.org, khilman@...nel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/30] drivers: gpio: msic: use subsys_platform_driver()
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 08:40:48PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> From: Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>
>
> Reduce driver init boilerplate by using the new
> subsys_platform_driver() macro.
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msic.c
> @@ -306,9 +306,4 @@ static int platform_msic_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> },
> .probe = platform_msic_gpio_probe,
> };
> -
> -static int __init platform_msic_gpio_init(void)
> -{
> - return platform_driver_register(&platform_msic_gpio_driver);
> -}
> -subsys_initcall(platform_msic_gpio_init);
> +subsys_platform_driver(platform_msic_gpio_driver);
How did you test this? Had you even compiled it?
P.S. Perhaps it makes #include <linux/init.h> redundant.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists