linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 12/17] soc/tegra: pmc: allow support for more tegra wake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bbbaaad7-d20d-c648-af73-ec0960a33896@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:26:26 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        jason@...edaemon.net, linus.walleij@...aro.org, stefan@...er.ch,
        mark.rutland@....com
Cc:     pdeschrijver@...dia.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        jckuo@...dia.com, josephl@...dia.com, talho@...dia.com,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mperttunen@...dia.com, spatra@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        digetx@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 12/17] soc/tegra: pmc: allow support for more tegra
 wake

On 18/06/2019 08:46, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
> This patch allows to create separate irq_set_wake and irq_set_type
> implementations for different tegra designs PMC that has different
> wake models which require difference wake registers and different
> programming sequence.
> 
> AOWAKE model support is available for Tegra186 and Tegra194 only
> and it resides within PMC and supports tiered wake architecture.
> 
> Tegra210 and prior tegra designs uses PMC directly to receive wake
> events and coordinate the wake sequence.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index edd4fe06810f..e87f29a35fcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ struct tegra_pmc_soc {
>  	void (*setup_irq_polarity)(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,
>  				   struct device_node *np,
>  				   bool invert);
> +	int (*irq_set_wake)(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on);
> +	int (*irq_set_type)(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type);
>  
>  	const char * const *reset_sources;
>  	unsigned int num_reset_sources;
> @@ -1919,7 +1921,7 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops tegra_pmc_irq_domain_ops = {
>  	.alloc = tegra_pmc_irq_alloc,
>  };
>  
> -static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
> +static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>  {
>  	struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>  	unsigned int offset, bit;
> @@ -1951,7 +1953,7 @@ static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int tegra_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
> +static int tegra186_pmc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>  {
>  	struct tegra_pmc *pmc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>  	u32 value;
> @@ -2005,8 +2007,10 @@ static int tegra_pmc_irq_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc)
>  	pmc->irq.irq_unmask = irq_chip_unmask_parent;
>  	pmc->irq.irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent;
>  	pmc->irq.irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent;
> -	pmc->irq.irq_set_type = tegra_pmc_irq_set_type;
> -	pmc->irq.irq_set_wake = tegra_pmc_irq_set_wake;
> +	if (pmc->soc->irq_set_type)
> +		pmc->irq.irq_set_type = pmc->soc->irq_set_type;
> +	if (pmc->soc->irq_set_wake)
> +		pmc->irq.irq_set_wake = pmc->soc->irq_set_wake;

Two cases: either the value is non NULL, and we assign it, or it is
NULL, and we leave it to what it was, presumably NULL. I guess you can
drop the both ifs.

>  
>  	pmc->domain = irq_domain_add_hierarchy(parent, 0, 96, pmc->dev->of_node,
>  					       &tegra_pmc_irq_domain_ops, pmc);
> @@ -2679,6 +2683,8 @@ static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra186_pmc_soc = {
>  	.regs = &tegra186_pmc_regs,
>  	.init = NULL,
>  	.setup_irq_polarity = tegra186_pmc_setup_irq_polarity,
> +	.irq_set_wake = tegra186_pmc_irq_set_wake,
> +	.irq_set_type = tegra186_pmc_irq_set_type,
>  	.reset_sources = tegra186_reset_sources,
>  	.num_reset_sources = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra186_reset_sources),
>  	.reset_levels = tegra186_reset_levels,
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...