[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618093730.GA5629@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:37:30 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to be
reserved
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 01:43:00AM +0000, Lendacky, Thomas wrote:
> Yes and no... it doesn't say how it is done, namely through the use of
> memblock_reserve() calls and when and where those occur.
Ah ok, so you found that out and documented it now. Good.
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists