[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618095521.GE23549@piout.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:55:21 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
claudiu.beznea@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] clk: at91: sckc: improve error path
On 13/06/2019 15:37:06+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> This series tries to improve error path for slow clock registrations
> by adding functions to free resources and using them on failures.
>
Does the platform even boot when the slow clock is not available?
The TCB clocksource would fail at:
tc.slow_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(node->parent, "slow_clk");
if (IS_ERR(tc.slow_clk))
return PTR_ERR(tc.slow_clk);
> It is created on top of patch series at [1].
>
> Thank you,
> Claudiu Beznea
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1558433454-27971-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com/
>
> Claudiu Beznea (7):
> clk: at91: sckc: add support to free slow oscillator
> clk: at91: sckc: add support to free slow rc oscillator
> clk: at91: sckc: add support to free slow clock osclillator
> clk: at91: sckc: improve error path for sam9x5 sck register
> clk: at91: sckc: remove unnecessary line
> clk: at91: sckc: improve error path for sama5d4 sck registration
> clk: at91: sckc: use dedicated functions to unregister clock
>
> drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists