linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190618113401.ybs7k7k3oxkl2ql4@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:04:01 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Qais.Yousef@....com, mka@...omium.org, juri.lelli@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS
 framework

On 18-06-19, 01:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> One more thing.
> 
> handle_update() is very similar to cpufreq_update_freq_work().
> 
> Why are both of them needed?

I probably did that because of locking required in cpufreq_update_freq_work()
but maybe I can do better. Lemme try and come back on it.

-- 
viresh