linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: dts: rockchip: set PWM delay backlight settings for Minnie"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190618120221.GA20524@amd>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:02:21 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: dts: rockchip: set PWM delay backlight
 settings for Minnie"

On Mon 2019-06-17 09:16:25, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 05:41:43PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > This reverts commit 288ceb85b505c19abe1895df068dda5ed20cf482.
> > > 
> > > According to the commit message the AUO B101EAN01 panel on minnie
> > > requires a PWM delay of 200 ms, however this is not what the
> > > datasheet says. The datasheet mentions a *max* delay of 200 ms
> > > for T2 ("delay from LCDVDD to black video generation") and T3
> > > ("delay from LCDVDD to HPD high"), which aren't related to the
> > > PWM. The backlight power sequence does not specify min/max
> > > constraints for T15 (time from PWM on to BL enable) or T16
> > > (time from BL disable to PWM off).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > > Enric, if you think I misinterpreted the datasheet please holler!
> > 
> > Was this tested?
> 
> I performed limited manually testing.
> 
> minnie ships with the Chrome OS 3.14 downstream, which doesn't include
> this delay, to my knowledge there are no open display related bugs for
> minnie. One could argue that a the configuration without the delay was
> widely field tested
> 
> > Does patch being reverted actually break anything?
> 
> To my knowledge it doesn't really break anything, however there is a
> short user perceptible delay between switching on the LCD and
> switching on the backlight. It's not the end of the world, but if it's
> not actually needed better avoid it.
> 
> > If so, cc stable?
> 
> I guess this is an edge case, were you could go either way. I'm fine
> with respinning and cc-ing stable.

Ok, if it is just a small delay, stable probably does not need to be
involved.

Thanks,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)