linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 16/21] memory: mtk-smi: Add bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1560859855.8082.24.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:10:55 +0800
From:   Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        "Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <youlin.pei@...iatek.com>, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        <anan.sun@...iatek.com>, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/21] memory: mtk-smi: Add bus_sel for mt8183

On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 18:23 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 10/06/2019 14:17, Yong Wu wrote:
> > There are 2 mmu cells in a M4U HW. we could adjust some larbs entering
> > mmu0 or mmu1 to balance the bandwidth via the smi-common register
> > SMI_BUS_SEL(0x220)(Each larb occupy 2 bits).
> > 
> > In mt8183, For better performance, we switch larb1/2/5/7 to enter
> > mmu1 while the others still keep enter mmu0.
> > 
> > In mt8173 and mt2712, we don't get the performance issue,
> > Keep its default value(0x0), that means all the larbs enter mmu0.
> > 
> > Note: smi gen1(mt2701/mt7623) don't have this bus_sel.
> > 
> > And, the base of smi-common is completely different with smi_ao_base
> > of gen1, thus I add new variable for that.
> > 
> > CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > index 9790801..08cf40d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@
> >  #define SMI_LARB_NONSEC_CON(id)	(0x380 + ((id) * 4))
> >  #define F_MMU_EN		BIT(0)
> >  
> > +/* SMI COMMON */
> > +#define SMI_BUS_SEL			0x220
> > +#define SMI_BUS_LARB_SHIFT(larbid)	((larbid) << 1)
> > +/* All are MMU0 defaultly. Only specialize mmu1 here. */
> > +#define F_MMU1_LARB(larbid)		(0x1 << SMI_BUS_LARB_SHIFT(larbid))
> > +
> >  enum mtk_smi_gen {
> >  	MTK_SMI_GEN1,
> >  	MTK_SMI_GEN2
> > @@ -57,6 +63,7 @@ enum mtk_smi_gen {
> >  struct mtk_smi_common_plat {
> >  	enum mtk_smi_gen gen;
> >  	bool             has_gals;
> > +	u32              bus_sel; /* Balance some larbs to enter mmu0 or mmu1 */
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct mtk_smi_larb_gen {
> > @@ -72,8 +79,8 @@ struct mtk_smi {
> >  	struct clk			*clk_apb, *clk_smi;
> >  	struct clk			*clk_gals0, *clk_gals1;
> >  	struct clk			*clk_async; /*only needed by mt2701*/
> > -	void __iomem			*smi_ao_base;
> > -
> > +	void __iomem			*smi_ao_base; /* only for gen1 */
> > +	void __iomem			*base;	      /* only for gen2 */
> 
> union {} maybe?

Yes. Thanks.

I will add it.

> 
> >  	const struct mtk_smi_common_plat *plat;
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -410,6 +417,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_larb_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_mt8183 = {
> >  	.gen      = MTK_SMI_GEN2,
> >  	.has_gals = true,
> > +	.bus_sel  = F_MMU1_LARB(1) | F_MMU1_LARB(2) | F_MMU1_LARB(5) |
> > +		    F_MMU1_LARB(7),
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_common_of_ids[] = {
> > @@ -482,6 +491,11 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		ret = clk_prepare_enable(common->clk_async);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> > +	} else {
> > +		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > +		common->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(common->base))
> > +			return PTR_ERR(common->base);
> 
> We must be backwards compatible with DT which does not have the base defined.

The smi-common node in the previous mt2712 and mt8173 also have the
"reg" property even though they didn't use this base, Thus, It looks ok
for all the cases.

> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> >  	}
> >  	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, common);
> > @@ -497,6 +511,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_common_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct mtk_smi *common = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +	u32 bus_sel = common->plat->bus_sel;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	ret = mtk_smi_clk_enable(common);
> > @@ -504,6 +519,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_common_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  		dev_err(common->dev, "Failed to enable clock(%d).\n", ret);
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	if (common->plat->gen == MTK_SMI_GEN2 && bus_sel)
> > +		writel(bus_sel, common->base + SMI_BUS_SEL);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >