lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618133948.GB5416@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:39:48 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] Documentation: platform: convert
 x86-laptop-drivers.txt to reST

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 07:17:17AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:41:58 +0200
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:02:27AM +0530, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> > > This converts the plain text documentation to reStructuredText format.
> > > No essential content change.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/platform/x86-laptop-drivers.rst | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  Documentation/platform/x86-laptop-drivers.txt | 18 ---------------
> > >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/platform/x86-laptop-drivers.rst
> > >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/platform/x86-laptop-drivers.txt  
> > 
> > Don't you also need to hook it up to the documentation build process
> > when doing this?
> 
> Hooking it into the TOC tree is a good thing, but I think it's also good
> to think about the exercise in general.  This is a document dropped into
> place five years ago and never touched again.  It's a short list of
> seemingly ancient laptops with no explanation of what it means.  So the
> real question, IMO, is whether this document is useful to anybody and, if
> not, whether it should just be deleted instead.

I bet it should be deleted, but we should ask the platform driver
maintainers first before we do that :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ