[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ac26e68-8b75-1b06-eecd-950987550451@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:30:02 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] page flags: prioritize kasan bits over last-cpuid
On 6/18/19 12:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ARM64 randdconfig builds regularly run into a build error, especially
> when NUMA_BALANCING and SPARSEMEM are enabled but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP:
>
> #error "KASAN: not enough bits in page flags for tag"
>
> The last-cpuid bits are already contitional on the available space,
> so the result of the calculation is a bit random on whether they
> were already left out or not.
>
> Adding the kasan tag bits before last-cpuid makes it much more likely
> to end up with a successful build here, and should be reliable for
> randconfig at least, as long as that does not randomize NR_CPUS
> or NODES_SHIFT but uses the defaults.
>
> In order for the modified check to not trigger in the x86 vdso32 code
> where all constants are wrong (building with -m32), enclose all the
> definitions with an #ifdef.
>
Why not keep "#error "KASAN: not enough bits in page flags for tag"" under "#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS" ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists