[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618161340.GA13983@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:13:40 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Muchun Song <smuchun@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>,
Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>, gkohli@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
zhaowuyun@...gtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] driver core: Fix use-after-free and double free on
glue directory
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:09:40AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> 于2019年6月18日周二 下午11:29写道:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 09:40:13PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > Ping guys ? I think this is worth fixing.
> >
> > That's great (no context here), but I need people to actually agree on
> > what the correct fix should be. I had two different patches that were
> > saying they fixed the same issue, and that feels really wrong.
>
> Another patch:
> Subject: [PATCH v3] drivers: core: Remove glue dirs early only
> when refcount is 1
>
> My first v1 patch:
> Subject: [PATCH] driver core: Fix use-after-free and double free
> on glue directory
>
> The above two patches are almost the same that fix is based on the refcount.
> But why we change the solution from v1 to v4? Some discussion can
> refer to the mail:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] driver core: Fix use-after-free and double free
> on glue directory
Again, I am totally confused and do not see a patch in an email that I
can apply...
Someone needs to get people to agree here...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists