[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <946B2B53-7A16-4B8D-8CB9-34EFFB9E84D6@sifive.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:49:51 -0500
From: Troy Benjegerdes <troy.benjegerdes@...ive.com>
To: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"palmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
"jamez@....com" <jamez@....com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"schwab@...e.de" <schwab@...e.de>,
"nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"sachin.ghadi@...ive.com" <sachin.ghadi@...ive.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"ynezz@...e.cz" <ynezz@...e.cz>,
"yash.shah@...ive.com" <yash.shah@...ive.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>,
Lukas Auer <lukas.auer@...ec.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add macb support for SiFive FU540-C000
> On Jun 18, 2019, at 4:32 AM, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> wrote:
>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=72296bde4f4207566872ee355950a59cbc29f852
I added your patches, along with two of mine, and rebased them
to the latest U-boot master, and put them on the ‘to-upstream’ branch
at https://github.com/sifive/u-boot/tree/to-upstream
I am most interested in review of the patch that adds the DTS files
from Linux to U-boot, along with a ‘-u-boot.dtsi’ file which includes
several extra things, most notably an ethernet entry [1] which does
not match the new proposed changes for the MacB driver that Yash
is working on.
How close are we to consensus on the new “sifive,fu540-macb”
device tree entry format? Is this something that is stable enough to
start basing some work in M-mode U-boot on yet, or do we expect
more changes?
[1] https://github.com/sifive/u-boot/commit/35e4168e36139722f30143a0ca0aa8637dd3ee04#diff-27d2d375ddac52f1bca71594075e1be4R93
Powered by blists - more mailing lists