[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618143234.78539805@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:32:34 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/ftrace: Update ftrace_location() for
powerpc -mprofile-kernel
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:53:11 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:17:04 +0530
> >> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> @@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ unsigned long ftrace_location_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> >>> key.flags = end; /* overload flags, as it is unsigned long */
> >>>
> >>> for (pg = ftrace_pages_start; pg; pg = pg->next) {
> >>> - if (end < pg->records[0].ip ||
> >>> + if (end <= pg->records[0].ip ||
> >>
> >> This breaks the algorithm. "end" is inclusive. That is, if you look for
> >> a single byte, where "start" and "end" are the same, and it happens to
> >> be the first ip on the pg page, it will be skipped, and not found.
> >
> > Thanks. It looks like I should be over-riding ftrace_location() instead.
> > I will update this patch.
>
> I think I will have ftrace own the two instruction range, regardless of
> whether the preceding instruction is a 'mflr r0' or not. This simplifies
> things and I don't see an issue with it as of now. I will do more
> testing to confirm.
>
> - Naveen
>
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -951,6 +951,16 @@ void arch_ftrace_update_code(int command)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL
> +/*
> + * We consider two instructions -- 'mflr r0', 'bl _mcount' -- to be part
> + * of ftrace. When checking for the first instruction, we want to include
> + * the next instruction in the range check.
> + */
> +unsigned long ftrace_location(unsigned long ip)
> +{
> + return ftrace_location_range(ip, ip + MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> /* Returns 1 if we patched in the mflr */
> static int __ftrace_make_call_prep(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
> {
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 21d8e201ee80..122e2bb4a739 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -1573,7 +1573,7 @@ unsigned long ftrace_location_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> * the function tracer. It checks the ftrace internal tables to
> * determine if the address belongs or not.
> */
> -unsigned long ftrace_location(unsigned long ip)
> +unsigned long __weak ftrace_location(unsigned long ip)
> {
> return ftrace_location_range(ip, ip);
> }
Actually, instead of making this a weak function, let's do this:
In include/ftrace.h:
#ifndef FTRACE_IP_EXTENSION
# define FTRACE_IP_EXTENSION 0
#endif
In arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
#define FTRACE_IP_EXTENSION MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE
Then we can just have:
unsigned long ftrace_location(unsigned long ip)
{
return ftrace_location_range(ip, ip + FTRACE_IP_EXTENSION);
}
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists