[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618184710.GP5316@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:47:10 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@...gle.com>
Cc: Fletcher Woodruff <fletcherw@...omium.org>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@...omium.org>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...omium.org>,
ALSA development <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] ASoC: rt5677: clear interrupts by polarity flip
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:12:58AM -0700, Curtis Malainey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:01 AM Fletcher Woodruff
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:56 AM Cezary Rojewski
> > > On 2019-06-14 21:48, Fletcher Woodruff wrote:
> > > > + ret = regmap_read(rt5677->regmap, RT5677_IRQ_CTRL1, ®_irq);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + pr_err("rt5677: failed reading IRQ status: %d\n", ret);
> > > The entire rt5677 makes use of dev_XXX with the exception of.. this very
> > > function. Consider reusing "component" field which is already part of
> > > struct rt5677_priv and removing pr_XXX.
> > I was using dev_XXX, but I believe Curtis found that 'component' was
> > sometimes uninitialized when this function was called, so I switched
> > back to pr_XXX. I may be misremembering though, so I'll let Curtis
> > comment as well.
> The issue here is that the IRQ is setup in the i2c probe and the
> component is setup in the codec probe. In theory if the hardware is in
The component is not needed for a struct device, you must have a struct
device if you have a regmap or have probed at all.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists