[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190619060250.GH18776@kadam>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:02:50 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>, linux-ntb@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NTB: test: remove a duplicate check
It's not a huge deal obviously but your commit was a6bed7a54165 ("NTB:
Introduce NTB MSI Test Client") but you know that if I had sent a patch
called ("NTB: remove a duplicate check") people would have correctly
complained because the patch prefix is too vague.
What I'm saying is we do this all the time:
[PATCH] NTB: add a new foobazle driver
But it should be:
[PATCH] NTB: foobazle: add a new foobazle driver
Then I can just copy and paste your patch prefix instead of trying
invent one.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists