linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor clock control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1560935987.2158.8.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:19:47 +0800
From:   Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
To:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
CC:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor clock control

On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 20:02 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:02 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > Put clock enable and disable control in separate function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > index 765ad4a5e5df..3e9be07a2627 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > @@ -208,6 +208,33 @@ static int scpsys_regulator_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> >         return regulator_disable(scpd->supply);
> >  }
> >
> > +static int scpsys_clk_enable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num)
> > +{
> > +       int i, ret = 0;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < max_num && clk[i]; i++) {
> > +               ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk[i]);
> > +               if (ret) {
> > +                       for (--i; i >= 0; i--)
> > +                               clk_disable_unprepare(clk[i]);
> 
> Would it be simpler to just call scpsys_clk_disable(clk, i) ?
> 

OK, I'll try.

> > +
> > +                       break;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> 
> Maybe not for this series, but could you use clk_bulk_prepare_enable
> instead? The only issue is that it'd still call clk_prepare_enable on
> NULL clocks, but that does nothing, so it's just a little less
> efficient...
> 

OK, I'll try after this series.

> > +
> > +static void scpsys_clk_disable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num)
> > +{
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       for (i = max_num - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > +               if (clk[i])
> 
> if test not needed, clk_disable_unprepare ignores NULL parameters.
> 

You're right. Supposed it's not needed, I'll test.

> > +                       clk_disable_unprepare(clk[i]);
> > +       }
> > +}
> 
> ditto: clk_bulk_disable_unprepare
> 
> > +
> >  static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >  {
> >         struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
> > @@ -216,21 +243,14 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >         u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
> >         u32 val;
> >         int ret, tmp;
> > -       int i;
> >
> >         ret = scpsys_regulator_enable(scpd);
> >         if (ret < 0)
> >                 return ret;
> >
> > -       for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLKS && scpd->clk[i]; i++) {
> > -               ret = clk_prepare_enable(scpd->clk[i]);
> > -               if (ret) {
> > -                       for (--i; i >= 0; i--)
> > -                               clk_disable_unprepare(scpd->clk[i]);
> > -
> > -                       goto err_clk;
> > -               }
> > -       }
> > +       ret = scpsys_clk_enable(scpd->clk, MAX_CLKS);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               goto err_clk;
> >
> >         val = readl(ctl_addr);
> >         val |= PWR_ON_BIT;
> > @@ -283,10 +303,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >         return 0;
> >
> >  err_pwr_ack:
> > -       for (i = MAX_CLKS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > -               if (scpd->clk[i])
> > -                       clk_disable_unprepare(scpd->clk[i]);
> > -       }
> > +       scpsys_clk_disable(scpd->clk, MAX_CLKS);
> >  err_clk:
> >         scpsys_regulator_disable(scpd);
> >
> > @@ -303,7 +320,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >         u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
> >         u32 val;
> >         int ret, tmp;
> > -       int i;
> >
> >         if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> >                 ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> > @@ -344,8 +360,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >         if (ret < 0)
> >                 goto out;
> >
> > -       for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLKS && scpd->clk[i]; i++)
> > -               clk_disable_unprepare(scpd->clk[i]);
> > +       scpsys_clk_disable(scpd->clk, MAX_CLKS);
> >
> >         ret = scpsys_regulator_disable(scpd);
> >         if (ret < 0)
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >