linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] module: Propagate MODULE_STATE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190619112529.GO3419@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:25:29 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] module: Propagate MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier
 errors

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Some module notifiers; such as jump_label_module_notifier(),
> > tracepoint_module_notify(); can fail the MODULE_STATE_COMING callback
> > (due to -ENOMEM for example). However module.c:prepare_coming_module()
> > ignores all such errors, even though this function can already fail due
> > to klp_module_coming().
> 
> It does, but there is no change from the pre-prepare_coming_module() 
> times. Coming notifiers were called in complete_formation(), their return 
> values happily ignored and going notifiers not called to clean up even 
> before.

Sure; but I didn't care to look before :-) The fact that it can
currently fail means most/all the unwinding is already there and we only
need to consider the additional cases.