[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190619112723.sktnns3qfdfh3lvi@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:27:23 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] drm: add gem array helpers
> > +struct drm_gem_object_array*
> > +drm_gem_array_from_handles(struct drm_file *drm_file, u32 *handles, u32 nents)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_gem_object_array *objs;
> > + u32 i;
> > +
> > + objs = drm_gem_array_alloc(nents);
> > + if (!objs)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nents; i++) {
> > + objs->objs[i] = drm_gem_object_lookup(drm_file, handles[i]);
> > + if (!objs->objs[i]) {
> Missing object put for the 0..i-1 handles. Personally I would:
No. drm_gem_array_alloc initializes objs->nents and
drm_gem_array_put_free() loops over the whole array,
skipping NULL pointers.
> > + drm_gem_array_put_free(objs);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return objs;
> > +}
> Missing EXPORT_SYMBOL?
Oops. I had that fixed. Possibly squashed into the wrong patch.
> Ditto?
Yes.
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists