linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 0/2] clocksource: davinci-timer: new driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:23:35 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/2] clocksource: davinci-timer: new driver

On 18/06/19 11:33 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 14/06/2019 16:25, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 14/06/2019 12:39, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On 05/06/19 2:03 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is another version of the new davinci clocksource driver. After much
>>>> discussion this contains many changes to simplify and improve the driver.
>>>
>>> Does this look good to you now? If yes, can you please merge and provide
>>> an immutable branch to me so I can merge dependent mach-davinci patches?
>>
>> Yes, I think it is fine.
>>
>> http://git@....linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git
>> timers/drivers/davinci
>>
>> It is v5.2-rc4 + (2 x patches)
>>
>> It is merged in clockevents/next which is exported to linux-next and for
>> kernel-ci.
>>
>> AFAIU, the patch was compiled and tested. If not, please let me know.
>>
>> Please, wait a couple of days I confirm the tests passed and you can
>> consider the branch immutable.
> 
> lkp complained, please do not use the branch.
> 
> I'm waiting for Bartosz to fix the issue.

Alright, noted.

Thanks,
Sekhar