| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190619121540.29320-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:15:32 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>, kernel@...labora.com,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] lib/sort.c: implement sort() variant taking context argument
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Our list_sort() utility has always supported a context argument that
is passed through to the comparison routine. Now there's a use case
for the similar thing for sort().
This implements sort_r by simply extending the existing sort function
in the obvious way. To avoid code duplication, we want to implement
sort() in terms of sort_r(). The naive way to do that is
static int cmp_wrapper(const void *a, const void *b, const void *ctx)
{
int (*real_cmp)(const void*, const void*) = ctx;
return real_cmp(a, b);
}
sort(..., cmp) { sort_r(..., cmp_wrapper, cmp) }
but this would do two indirect calls for each comparison. Instead, do
as is done for the default swap functions - that only adds a cost of a
single easily predicted branch to each comparison call.
Aside from introducing support for the context argument, this also
serves as preparation for patches that will eliminate the indirect
comparison calls in common cases.
Requested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
Hi all,
Andrew, you acked the first version of this patch, but Rasmus proposed
a better solution and posted a v2. Can you review/ack this version.
Hans, Mauro, Andrew suggested to have this patch applied along with
its first user (the H264 backend of the hantro codec), so here it is.
Note that, if possible, I'd like to have this patch queued for the next
release even if the H264 bits don't get accepted as is. The rationale
here being that Rasmus told me he was planning to further improve the
sort() logic after the next -rc1 is out, and I fear his changes will
conflict with this patch, which might involve some kind synchronisation
(a topic branch) between the media maintainers and Andrew.
Let me know how you want to proceed with that.
Regards,
Boris
---
include/linux/sort.h | 5 +++++
lib/sort.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sort.h b/include/linux/sort.h
index 2b99a5dd073d..61b96d0ebc44 100644
--- a/include/linux/sort.h
+++ b/include/linux/sort.h
@@ -4,6 +4,11 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
+void sort_r(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
+ int (*cmp)(const void *, const void *, const void *),
+ void (*swap)(void *, void *, int),
+ const void *priv);
+
void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
int (*cmp)(const void *, const void *),
void (*swap)(void *, void *, int));
diff --git a/lib/sort.c b/lib/sort.c
index cf408aec3733..d54cf97e9548 100644
--- a/lib/sort.c
+++ b/lib/sort.c
@@ -144,6 +144,18 @@ static void do_swap(void *a, void *b, size_t size, swap_func_t swap_func)
swap_func(a, b, (int)size);
}
+typedef int (*cmp_func_t)(const void *, const void *);
+typedef int (*cmp_r_func_t)(const void *, const void *, const void *);
+#define _CMP_WRAPPER ((cmp_r_func_t)0L)
+
+static int do_cmp(const void *a, const void *b,
+ cmp_r_func_t cmp, const void *priv)
+{
+ if (cmp == _CMP_WRAPPER)
+ return ((cmp_func_t)(priv))(a, b);
+ return cmp(a, b, priv);
+}
+
/**
* parent - given the offset of the child, find the offset of the parent.
* @i: the offset of the heap element whose parent is sought. Non-zero.
@@ -171,12 +183,13 @@ static size_t parent(size_t i, unsigned int lsbit, size_t size)
}
/**
- * sort - sort an array of elements
+ * sort_r - sort an array of elements
* @base: pointer to data to sort
* @num: number of elements
* @size: size of each element
* @cmp_func: pointer to comparison function
* @swap_func: pointer to swap function or NULL
+ * @priv: third argument passed to comparison function
*
* This function does a heapsort on the given array. You may provide
* a swap_func function if you need to do something more than a memory
@@ -188,9 +201,10 @@ static size_t parent(size_t i, unsigned int lsbit, size_t size)
* O(n*n) worst-case behavior and extra memory requirements that make
* it less suitable for kernel use.
*/
-void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
- int (*cmp_func)(const void *, const void *),
- void (*swap_func)(void *, void *, int size))
+void sort_r(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
+ int (*cmp_func)(const void *, const void *, const void *),
+ void (*swap_func)(void *, void *, int size),
+ const void *priv)
{
/* pre-scale counters for performance */
size_t n = num * size, a = (num/2) * size;
@@ -238,12 +252,12 @@ void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
* average, 3/4 worst-case.)
*/
for (b = a; c = 2*b + size, (d = c + size) < n;)
- b = cmp_func(base + c, base + d) >= 0 ? c : d;
+ b = do_cmp(base + c, base + d, cmp_func, priv) >= 0 ? c : d;
if (d == n) /* Special case last leaf with no sibling */
b = c;
/* Now backtrack from "b" to the correct location for "a" */
- while (b != a && cmp_func(base + a, base + b) >= 0)
+ while (b != a && do_cmp(base + a, base + b, cmp_func, priv) >= 0)
b = parent(b, lsbit, size);
c = b; /* Where "a" belongs */
while (b != a) { /* Shift it into place */
@@ -252,4 +266,12 @@ void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
}
}
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort_r);
+
+void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
+ int (*cmp_func)(const void *, const void *),
+ void (*swap_func)(void *, void *, int size))
+{
+ return sort_r(base, num, size, _CMP_WRAPPER, swap_func, cmp_func);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists