[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190619123019.30032-7-mszeredi@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:30:13 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] proc: don't ignore options
The options "sync", "async", "dirsync", "lazytime", "nolazytime", "mand"
and "nomand" make no sense for the proc filesystem. If these options are
supplied to fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_FLAG), then return -EINVAL instead of
silently ignoring the option.
Any implementation, such as mount(8) that needs to parse this option
without failing should simply ignore the return value from fsconfig().
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
---
fs/proc/root.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c
index 6ef1527ad975..70127eaba04d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/root.c
+++ b/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int proc_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
struct fs_parse_result result;
int ret, opt;
- ret = vfs_parse_sb_flag(fc, param);
+ ret = vfs_parse_ro_rw(fc, param);
if (ret != -ENOPARAM)
return ret;
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists