lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:21:29 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add support for
 Raydium RM67191 panel

Hi Robert,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:33 AM Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com> wrote:

> +Optional properties:
> +- reset-gpios:         a GPIO spec for the RST_B GPIO pin
> +- pinctrl-0            phandle to the pin settings for the reset pin
> +- width-mm:            physical panel width [mm]
> +- height-mm:           physical panel height [mm]
> +- display-timings:     timings for the connected panel according to [1]

Still not convinced we need the 'display-timings' property, even as an
optional property. My understanding is that passing display timings in
the devicetree is not encouraged.

Last time you said you need to pass ''display-timings' to workaround
the problem of connecting this panel to mx8m DCSS or eLCDIF.

The panel timings come from the LCD manufacturer and it is agnostic to
what display controller interface it is connected to.

So I suggest making sure the timings passed in the driver are correct
as per the vendor datasheet. If they are correct and one specific
interface is not able to drive it, then probably it is a bug in this
specific display controller interface or in the SoC clock driver.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ