[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20831975-590f-ecab-53db-5d7e6b1a053f@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:30:16 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Add a memcg_slabinfo debugfs file
On 6/19/19 11:18 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 7:46 AM Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>> There are concerns about memory leaks from extensive use of memory
>> cgroups as each memory cgroup creates its own set of kmem caches. There
>> is a possiblity that the memcg kmem caches may remain even after the
>> memory cgroup removal. Therefore, it will be useful to show how many
>> memcg caches are present for each of the kmem caches.
>>
>> This patch introduces a new <debugfs>/memcg_slabinfo file which is
>> somewhat similar to /proc/slabinfo in format, but lists only slabs that
>> are in memcg kmem caches. Information available in /proc/slabinfo are
>> not repeated in memcg_slabinfo.
>>
> At Google, we have an interface /proc/slabinfo_full which shows each
> kmem cache (root and memcg) on a separate line i.e. no accumulation.
> This interface has helped us a lot for debugging zombies and memory
> leaks. The name of the memcg kmem caches include the memcg name, css
> id and "dead" for offlined memcgs. I think these extra information is
> much more useful for debugging. What do you think?
>
> Shakeel
Yes, I think that can be a good idea. My only concern is that it can be
very verbose. Will work on a v2 patch.
Thanks,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists