linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:53:48 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT info

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:27 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 11:18 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Add keyword support so that our mailing list gets cc'ed for clang/llvm
> > patches.
>
> You'd also possibly get cc'd on patches that merely mention
> clang or llvm like any change to clang-format.  It could be
> many files that aren't interesting.
>
> $ git grep -i -w -P --name-only '(?i:clang|llvm)' | wc -l
> 134

That's very much intentional.  We currently get ~11 emails a day from
various CI services (KernelCI, 0day bot), patch authors, etc. so I
don't think this adds too much more and it's mostly signal (signal to
noise).  Maybe the bpf stuff would be less relevant, but I don't think
it hurts.

> Please use a single tab after each : like below

gah! My editor does flag this
(https://github.com/nickdesaulniers/dotfiles/blob/37359525f5a403b4ed2d3f9d1bbbee2da8ec8115/.vimrc#L35-L41)
whether or not I notice is sadly another story. Good catch, v2
inbound.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers