[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190620174357.840962614@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:57:15 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>, mark.rutland@....com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 101/117] perf/ring_buffer: Fix exposing a temporarily decreased data_head
[ Upstream commit 1b038c6e05ff70a1e66e3e571c2e6106bdb75f53 ]
In perf_output_put_handle(), an IRQ/NMI can happen in below location and
write records to the same ring buffer:
...
local_dec_and_test(&rb->nest)
... <-- an IRQ/NMI can happen here
rb->user_page->data_head = head;
...
In this case, a value A is written to data_head in the IRQ, then a value
B is written to data_head after the IRQ. And A > B. As a result,
data_head is temporarily decreased from A to B. And a reader may see
data_head < data_tail if it read the buffer frequently enough, which
creates unexpected behaviors.
This can be fixed by moving dec(&rb->nest) to after updating data_head,
which prevents the IRQ/NMI above from updating data_head.
[ Split up by peterz. ]
Signed-off-by: Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com
Fixes: ef60777c9abd ("perf: Optimize the perf_output() path by removing IRQ-disables")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517115418.224478157@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
index 99becab2c1ce..524744a38d61 100644
--- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
@@ -52,11 +52,18 @@ static void perf_output_put_handle(struct perf_output_handle *handle)
head = local_read(&rb->head);
/*
- * IRQ/NMI can happen here, which means we can miss a head update.
+ * IRQ/NMI can happen here and advance @rb->head, causing our
+ * load above to be stale.
*/
- if (!local_dec_and_test(&rb->nest))
+ /*
+ * If this isn't the outermost nesting, we don't have to update
+ * @rb->user_page->data_head.
+ */
+ if (local_read(&rb->nest) > 1) {
+ local_dec(&rb->nest);
goto out;
+ }
/*
* Since the mmap() consumer (userspace) can run on a different CPU:
@@ -88,9 +95,18 @@ static void perf_output_put_handle(struct perf_output_handle *handle)
rb->user_page->data_head = head;
/*
- * Now check if we missed an update -- rely on previous implied
- * compiler barriers to force a re-read.
+ * We must publish the head before decrementing the nest count,
+ * otherwise an IRQ/NMI can publish a more recent head value and our
+ * write will (temporarily) publish a stale value.
+ */
+ barrier();
+ local_set(&rb->nest, 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure we decrement @rb->nest before we validate the @rb->head.
+ * Otherwise we cannot be sure we caught the 'last' nested update.
*/
+ barrier();
if (unlikely(head != local_read(&rb->head))) {
local_inc(&rb->nest);
goto again;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists