lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 21:40:52 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH][bpf] bpf: verifier: add break statement in switch On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:02 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote: > > Notice that in this case, it's much clearer to explicitly add a break > rather than letting the code to fall through. It also avoid potential > future fall-through warnings[1]. > > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable > -Wimplicit-fallthrough. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1087056/ > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com> this type of changes are not suitable for bpf tree. Pls submit both as single patch to bpf-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists