linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: media: fix style problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190620050931.GA29061@archlinux-epyc>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 22:09:31 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To:     Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: media: fix style problem

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:32:48AM +0530, Aliasgar Surti wrote:
> From: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@...il.com>
> 
> checkpatch reported "WARNING: line over 80 characters".
> This patch fixes the warning for file davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c
> index 46fd818..12bdf91 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ static int isif_validate_dfc_params(const struct vpfe_isif_dfc *dfc)
>  #define DM365_ISIF_MAX_CLVSV			0x1fff
>  #define DM365_ISIF_MAX_HEIGHT_BLACK_REGION	0x1fff
>  
> -static int isif_validate_bclamp_params(const struct vpfe_isif_black_clamp *bclamp)
> +static int isif_validate_bclamp_params(const struct vpfe_isif_black_clamp
> +				       *bclamp)

I think

static int
isif_validate_bclamp_params(const struct vpfe_isif_black_clamp *bclamp)

is a better choice for this change.

Cheers,
Nathan

>  {
>  	int err = -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -593,7 +594,8 @@ isif_validate_raw_params(const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params)
>  	return isif_validate_bclamp_params(&params->bclamp);
>  }
>  
> -static int isif_set_params(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params)
> +static int isif_set_params(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> +			   const struct vpfe_isif_raw_config *params)
>  {
>  	struct vpfe_isif_device *isif = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>