[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94bd685a-1c03-f234-7d3c-e5df0856845b@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 23:37:45 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] coresight: Abort probe for missing CPU phandle
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks for the review comments.
On 6/20/2019 11:13 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 07:15:47PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
>> index 07a1367c733f..43f32fa71ff9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
>> @@ -579,6 +579,9 @@ static int debug_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> drvdata->cpu = coresight_get_cpu(dev);
>> + if (drvdata->cpu == -ENODEV)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>
> As Suzuki pointed out, simply return the error message conveyed by
> coresight_get_cpu().
>
> Also please merge both patches together to avoid bisect nightmare.
Sure, will do it.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists