linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: devinfo: BLIST_TRY_VPD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq18stwrobf.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:31:32 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@...il.com>
Cc:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: devinfo: BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES for SanDisk Cruzer Blade


Marcos,

>> What's your confidence level wrt. all Cruzer Blades handling this
>> correctly? How many devices have you tested this change with?
>
> I've tested three Cruzer Blades that I have at hand, and all of them
> have VPD support, and also checked with a friend of mine that also
> have one. I can't say about "all others" but so far, 4/4 devices that
> I tested have VPD. (They were all SPC-3 or SPC-4 compliant).

That's not a very large sample. However, SanDisk have traditionally been
pretty good wrt. spec compliance.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering