[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63a2baa3-a784-bea1-b4cf-afe91663c285@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 23:42:22 +0200
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, pavel@....cz, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] leds: multicolor: Introduce a multicolor class
definition
Dan,
On 6/20/19 10:06 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Jacek
>
> Thanks for the review
You're welcome.
> On 6/20/19 11:10 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Thank you for the v5.
>>
>> I will confine myself to commenting only some parts since
>> the rest will undergo rework due to removal of sync API.
>>
>> On 5/23/19 9:08 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Introduce a multicolor class that groups colored LEDs
>>> within a LED node.
>>>
>>> The framework allows for dynamically setting individual LEDs
>>> or setting brightness levels of LEDs and updating them virtually
>>> simultaneously.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/leds/Kconfig | 10 +
>>> drivers/leds/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/leds/led-class-multicolor.c | 421 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/led-class-multicolor.h | 95 ++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 527 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/leds/led-class-multicolor.c
>>> create mode 100644 include/linux/led-class-multicolor.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>> index 0414adebb177..0696a13c9527 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,16 @@ config LEDS_CLASS_FLASH
>>> for the flash related features of a LED device. It can be built
>>> as a module.
>>> +config LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
>>> + tristate "LED Mulit Color LED Class Support"
>>> + depends on LEDS_CLASS
>>> + help
>>> + This option enables the multicolor LED sysfs class in
>>> /sys/class/leds.
>>> + It wraps LED Class and adds multicolor LED specific sysfs
>>> attributes
>>> + and kernel internal API to it. You'll need this to provide
>>> support
>>> + for multicolor LEDs that are grouped together. This class is not
>>> + intended for single color LEDs. It can be built as a module.
>>
>> extra whitespace:
>>
>> s/ It can/It can/
>
> Ack
>
>>
>> [...]
>>> +
>>> +static int multicolor_set_brightness(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
>>> + enum led_brightness brightness)
>>> +{
>>> + struct led_classdev_mc *mcled_cdev = lcdev_to_mccdev(led_cdev);
>>> + struct led_classdev_mc_data *data = mcled_cdev->data;
>>> + struct led_multicolor_ops *ops = mcled_cdev->ops;
>>> + struct led_classdev_mc_priv *priv;
>>> + unsigned long state = brightness;
>>> + int adj_value;
>>> + ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&led_cdev->led_access);
>>> +
>>> + if (ops->set_module_brightness) {
>>> + ret = ops->set_module_brightness(mcled_cdev, state);
>>> + goto unlock;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry(priv, &data->color_list, list) {
>>> + if (state && priv->brightness && priv->max_brightness) {
>>> + adj_value = state * ((priv->brightness * 100) /
>>> priv->max_brightness);
>>> + adj_value = adj_value / 100;
>>
>> Why the multiplication an then division by 100? And priv->max_brightness
>> stays unaltered? This changes the proportions. My python script works
>> just fine without those.
>
> Because the kernel does not do floating point math and the calculation
> is using the ratio
>
> between the intensity and max_intensity and multiplying against the
> requested brightness.
>
> priv->intensity = 100 (This is the current intensity of the color LED)
>
> priv->max_intensity = 255
>
> state = 80 (This is the requested cluster brightness)
>
> 100/255 = 0.392 which is 0.
>
> 0 * 80 = 0 this is not what the value should be
>
> But with the multiplier.
>
> 10000/255 = 39.2 which is 39 which means that the intensity is only 39%
> of the
>
> max_intensity.
>
> 39 * 80 = 3120 So to preserve the 39% from the 80 we multiply the
> percentage * requested cluster brightness
>
> 3120 / 100 = 31 then we normalize back
>
> I am not sure how your script is working without the multiplier.
Try to remove brackets around division operation.
Then first we are multiplying and only after that dividing.
$ echo "80 * 100 / 255" | bc
31
>>> + } else
>>> + adj_value = LED_OFF;
>>> +
>>> + ret = ops->set_color_brightness(priv->mcled_cdev,
>>> + priv->color_id, adj_value);
>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>> + goto unlock;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +unlock:
>>> + mutex_unlock(&led_cdev->led_access);
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>> [...]
>>> +int led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext(struct device *parent,
>>> + struct led_classdev_mc *mcled_cdev,
>>> + struct led_init_data *init_data)
>>> +{
>>> + struct led_classdev *led_cdev;
>>> + struct led_multicolor_ops *ops;
>>> + struct led_classdev_mc_data *data;
>>> + int ret;
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + if (!mcled_cdev)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + ops = mcled_cdev->ops;
>>> + if (!ops || !ops->set_color_brightness)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!data)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + mcled_cdev->data = data;
>>> + led_cdev = &mcled_cdev->led_cdev;
>>> +
>>> + if (led_cdev->brightness_set_blocking)
>>> + led_cdev->brightness_set_blocking = multicolor_set_brightness;
>>
>> This is weird. In leds-lp50xx.c you don't initialize
>> brightness_set_blocking and this still works?
>
> I will have to look. I don't believe I retested this on lp50xx only the
> lp55xx code.
>
>>
>> I believe this is kind of omission.
>>
>> And it is not reasonable to just override driver supplied op with
>> generic one just like that.
>>
>> I propose to initialize brightness_set or brightness_set_blocking
>> op as we used to do it for monochrome LEDs. Those function(s) on
>> driver side will either use device's hardware support for setting
>> color lightness, or will call a generic function provided by
>> LED multi color class for calculating intensities of all colors
>> it comprises in the cluster.
>>
>> I know this is different to what we've discussed on IRC, but now
>> it looks for me the most reasonable way to go.
>
> So you want the device driver to handle the brightness request and call
> into the framework for
>
> calculating the color intensities?
Exactly.
> That would work as well and solves a problem of HW supported brightness
> control like the LP50xx.
>
> The LP50xx would not need to call into the function for calculated
> intensities.
True.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists