[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e6568b7107d4cbef639f82a400ba8b1a@nexedi.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:01:43 +0000
From: <kirr@...edi.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kbuild-all@...org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci/switchtec: fix stream_open.cocci warnings (fwd)
Bjorn Helgaas писал 2019-06-19 23:19:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 04:27:52PM +0000, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>> Hi Julia, everyone.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Can you forward this patch to the people below if you think it is
>> > appropriate?
>>
>> Yes, this patch is appropriate. It was actually part of
>> git.kernel.org/linus/c5bf68fe0c86 . It should be safe, (and desirable
>> as
>> it removes a chance for deadlock) to apply it.
>>
>> Sebastian, Kurt, Logan, Bjorn, please consider picking it up.
>
> I don't get it. This appeared in v5.2-rc1 as c5bf68fe0c86 ("*: convert
> stream-like files from nonseekable_open -> stream_open"), so it looks
> like
> this is already done. What would you like me to do with it?
I meant just that it was ok to pick this change into 5.0-RT tree as
kbuild robot was suggesting. Sorry for not being clear.
Kirill
>> > Could I tell the kbuild people to add you to the CC list for
>> > this semantic patch?
>>
>> Yes, sure. Please feel free to add me to CC list for stream_open.cocci
>> related patches.
>>
>> Kirill
>>
>>
>> > thanks,
>> > julia
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 18:23:18 +0800
>> > From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> > To: kbuild@...org
>> > Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
>> > Subject: [PATCH] pci/switchtec: fix stream_open.cocci warnings
>> >
>> > CC: kbuild-all@...org
>> > TO: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>> > CC: Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>
>> > CC: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
>> > CC: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
>> > CC: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
>> > CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> >
>> > From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> >
>> > drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c:395:1-17: ERROR: switchtec_fops: .read() can deadlock .write(); change nonseekable_open -> stream_open to fix.
>> >
>> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/stream_open.cocci
>> >
>> > Fixes: a3a1e895d4fa ("pci/switchtec: Don't use completion's wait queue")
>> > Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-5.0.y-rt-rebase
>> > head: 31cc76d5590f5e60c2f26f029e40bc7d0441d93f
>> > commit: a3a1e895d4fa0508e11ac9107ace883a5b2a4d3b [171/305] pci/switchtec: Don't use completion's wait queue
>> > :::::: branch date: 6 days ago
>> > :::::: commit date: 6 days ago
>> >
>> > Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
>> >
>> > switchtec.c | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > --- a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
>> > @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int switchtec_dev_open(struct ino
>> > return PTR_ERR(stuser);
>> >
>> > filp->private_data = stuser;
>> > - nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
>> > + stream_open(inode, filp);
>> >
>> > dev_dbg(&stdev->dev, "%s: %p\n", __func__, stuser);
>> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists