[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD8Lp45ua=L+ixO+du=Njhy+dxjWobWA+V1i+Y2p6faeyt1FBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:11:26 +0800
From: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
linux-nvme <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] nvme: rename "pci" operations to "mmio"
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:11 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> The Linux NVMe driver will deal with NVMe as specified plus whatever
> minor tweaks we'll need for small bugs. Hiding it behind an AHCI
> device is completely out of scope and will not be accepted.
Do you have any new suggestions for alternative ways we can implement
support for this storage configuration?
I tried to follow your earlier suggestions regarding faking a PCI bus
here: (or let me know if you had something different in mind...)
https://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=156015271021614&w=2
but it looks like that is not going to fly either :(
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists