lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFqH_50RN0xXfzMDNRjQpk8egCEcxH7NEXr8KVYsh04mSLQEiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jun 2019 18:08:14 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rk3399_gru_sound: Support 32, 44.1 and 88.2 kHz
 sample rates

Hi Mark,

Missatge de Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> del dia dj., 20 de juny
2019 a les 17:42:
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:47:08PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > According to the datasheet the max98357a also supports 32, 44.1 and
> > 88.2 kHz sample rate. This support was also introduced recently by
> > commit fdf34366d324 ("ASoC: max98357a: add missing supported rates").
> > This patch adds support for these rates also for the machine driver so
> > we get rid of the errors like the below and we are able to play files
> > using these sample rates.
>
> Does the machine actually need to validate this at all?  The component
> drivers can all apply whatever constraints are needed and do their own
> validation, the machine driver is just getting in the way here.

I think you have reason, I'll test by removing these validation and
respin the patch.

Thanks,
~ Enric

> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ