[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFqH_50RN0xXfzMDNRjQpk8egCEcxH7NEXr8KVYsh04mSLQEiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 18:08:14 +0200
From: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rk3399_gru_sound: Support 32, 44.1 and 88.2 kHz
sample rates
Hi Mark,
Missatge de Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> del dia dj., 20 de juny
2019 a les 17:42:
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:47:08PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > According to the datasheet the max98357a also supports 32, 44.1 and
> > 88.2 kHz sample rate. This support was also introduced recently by
> > commit fdf34366d324 ("ASoC: max98357a: add missing supported rates").
> > This patch adds support for these rates also for the machine driver so
> > we get rid of the errors like the below and we are able to play files
> > using these sample rates.
>
> Does the machine actually need to validate this at all? The component
> drivers can all apply whatever constraints are needed and do their own
> validation, the machine driver is just getting in the way here.
I think you have reason, I'll test by removing these validation and
respin the patch.
Thanks,
~ Enric
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists