[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190620161721.h3wn4nibomrvriw4@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:17:22 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@...com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>,
Mickael GUENE <mickael.guene@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support
Hi Hugues,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:48:29AM +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
> This patch serie allows to connect non-parallel camera sensor to
> DCMI thanks to a bridge connected in between such as STMIPID02 [1].
>
> Media controller support is introduced first, then support of
> several sub-devices within pipeline with dynamic linking
> between them.
> In order to keep backward compatibility with applications
> relying on V4L2 interface only, format set on video node
> is propagated to all sub-devices connected to camera interface.
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg278002.html
General notes on the set, not related to any single patch:
- Where's the sub-device representing the bridge itself?
- As the driver becomes MC-centric, crop configuration takes place through
V4L2 sub-device interface, not through the video device node.
- Same goes for accessing sensor configuration: it does not take place
through video node but through the sub-device nodes.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists