linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: fix transfer failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bf478236-9aa7-68cc-4a56-296db2fc4379@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:43:04 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:     <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: fix transfer failure


On 20/06/2019 17:15, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> From Tegra186 onwards OUTSTANDING_REQUESTS field is added in channel
> configuration register (bits 7:4). ADMA allows a maximum of 8 reads
> to source and that many writes to target memory be outstanding at any
> given point of time. If this field is not programmed, DMA transfers
> fail to happen.

BTW, I am not sure I follow the above. You say a max of 8 reads to the
source, however, the field we are programming can have a value of up to
15. So does that mean this field should only be programmed with a max of 8?

Thanks
Jon

-- 
nvpublic