[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190620172347.GE19891@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:23:47 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/28] block: Never bounce dma-direct bios
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:12:16AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> It is expected the creator of the dma-direct bio will ensure the
> target device can access the DMA address it's creating bios for.
> It's also not possible to bounce a dma-direct bio seeing the block
> layer doesn't have any way to access the underlying data behind
> the DMA address.
>
> Thus, never bounce dma-direct bios.
I wonder how feasible it would be to implement a 'dma vec' copy
from/to?
That is about the only operation you could safely do on P2P BAR
memory.
I wonder if a copy implementation could somehow query the iommu layer
to get a kmap of the memory pointed at by the dma address so we don't
need to carry struct page around?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists