[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190620174340.209602656@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:56:15 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com>,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@...gle.com>,
Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@...il.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 18/84] fuse: retrieve: cap requested size to negotiated max_write
[ Upstream commit 7640682e67b33cab8628729afec8ca92b851394f ]
FUSE filesystem server and kernel client negotiate during initialization
phase, what should be the maximum write size the client will ever issue.
Correspondingly the filesystem server then queues sys_read calls to read
requests with buffer capacity large enough to carry request header + that
max_write bytes. A filesystem server is free to set its max_write in
anywhere in the range between [1*page, fc->max_pages*page]. In particular
go-fuse[2] sets max_write by default as 64K, wheres default fc->max_pages
corresponds to 128K. Libfuse also allows users to configure max_write, but
by default presets it to possible maximum.
If max_write is < fc->max_pages*page, and in NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler we
allow to retrieve more than max_write bytes, corresponding prepared
NOTIFY_REPLY will be thrown away by fuse_dev_do_read, because the
filesystem server, in full correspondence with server/client contract, will
be only queuing sys_read with ~max_write buffer capacity, and
fuse_dev_do_read throws away requests that cannot fit into server request
buffer. In turn the filesystem server could get stuck waiting indefinitely
for NOTIFY_REPLY since NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler returned OK which is
understood by clients as that NOTIFY_REPLY was queued and will be sent
back.
Cap requested size to negotiate max_write to avoid the problem. This
aligns with the way NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler works, which already
unconditionally caps requested retrieve size to fuse_conn->max_pages. This
way it should not hurt NOTIFY_RETRIEVE semantic if we return less data than
was originally requested.
Please see [1] for context where the problem of stuck filesystem was hit
for real, how the situation was traced and for more involving patch that
did not make it into the tree.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=155057023600853&w=2
[2] https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@...edi.com>
Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ static int fuse_retrieve(struct fuse_con
offset = outarg->offset & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK;
file_size = i_size_read(inode);
- num = outarg->size;
+ num = min(outarg->size, fc->max_write);
if (outarg->offset > file_size)
num = 0;
else if (outarg->offset + num > file_size)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists