[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PU1P153MB0169D420EAB61757DF4B337FBFE70@PU1P153MB0169.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 23:45:23 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"marcelo.cerri@...onical.com" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
CC: "Lili Deng (Wicresoft North America Ltd)" <v-lide@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI: hv: Fix a use-after-free bug in
hv_eject_device_work()
The commit 05f151a73ec2 itself is correct, but it exposes this
use-after-free bug, which is caught by some memory debug options.
Add a Fixes tag to indicate the dependency.
Fixes: 05f151a73ec2 ("PCI: hv: Fix a memory leak in hv_eject_device_work()")
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
In v2:
Replaced "hpdev->hbus" with "hbus", since we have the new "hbus" variable. [Michael Kelley]
drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
index 808a182830e5..5dadc964ad3b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -1880,6 +1880,7 @@ static void hv_pci_devices_present(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus,
static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct pci_eject_response *ejct_pkt;
+ struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus;
struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev;
struct pci_dev *pdev;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -1890,6 +1891,7 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
} ctxt;
hpdev = container_of(work, struct hv_pci_dev, wrk);
+ hbus = hpdev->hbus;
WARN_ON(hpdev->state != hv_pcichild_ejecting);
@@ -1900,8 +1902,7 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
* because hbus->pci_bus may not exist yet.
*/
wslot = wslot_to_devfn(hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot);
- pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(hpdev->hbus->sysdata.domain, 0,
- wslot);
+ pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(hbus->sysdata.domain, 0, wslot);
if (pdev) {
pci_lock_rescan_remove();
pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);
@@ -1909,9 +1910,9 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&hpdev->hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
list_del(&hpdev->list_entry);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpdev->hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
if (hpdev->pci_slot)
pci_destroy_slot(hpdev->pci_slot);
@@ -1920,7 +1921,7 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
ejct_pkt = (struct pci_eject_response *)&ctxt.pkt.message;
ejct_pkt->message_type.type = PCI_EJECTION_COMPLETE;
ejct_pkt->wslot.slot = hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot;
- vmbus_sendpacket(hpdev->hbus->hdev->channel, ejct_pkt,
+ vmbus_sendpacket(hbus->hdev->channel, ejct_pkt,
sizeof(*ejct_pkt), (unsigned long)&ctxt.pkt,
VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0);
@@ -1929,7 +1930,9 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
/* For the two refs got in new_pcichild_device() */
put_pcichild(hpdev);
put_pcichild(hpdev);
- put_hvpcibus(hpdev->hbus);
+ /* hpdev has been freed. Do not use it any more. */
+
+ put_hvpcibus(hbus);
}
/**
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists