[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1906220920320.180@nippy.intranet>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:50:24 +1000 (AEST)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
cc: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: Don't select SCSI_PROC_FS by default
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 21/06/2019 01:43, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> >
> >> How likely is it that distro kernels would *not* enable CHR_DEV_SG?
> >> (Distros tend to enable everything, and then some.)
> >
> > How likely is it that embedded developers would *not* disable
> > CHR_DEV_SG? They tend to disable everything, and then enable only what
> > they need.
>
> I don't see where you're going with this line of reasoning?
>
Exactly. This sort of reasoning goes nowhere.
> Below is my current (as of next-20190612) defconfig.
>
> Notice the options marked as "not set". These are options that are
> enabled by default (and which I've disabled).
>
> Everyone thinks "their" option is critical (and it is, *to them*) but,
> in fact, few really are -- universally.
The relevant policy is documented in
Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt.
If there are useful generalizations about the choice of defaults for
Kconfig symbols (or changing those defaults) that are not documented then
they probably should be.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists