[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGp9LzouA3vKf6Hb=Jdy2FLG_Hkzartaksav-JpbRiVkxAACiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 21:47:16 -0700
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Cc: "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuanjia Liu <Chuanjia.Liu@...iatek.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: mediatek: Ignore interrupts that are wake
only during resume
Hi Nicolas,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 8:55 PM Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Before suspending, mtk-eint would set the interrupt mask to the
> one in wake_mask. However, some of these interrupts may not have a
> corresponding interrupt handler, or the interrupt may be disabled.
>
> On resume, the eint irq handler would trigger nevertheless,
> and irq/pm.c:irq_pm_check_wakeup would be called, which would
> try to call irq_disable. However, if the interrupt is not enabled
> (irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) is true), the call does nothing,
> and the interrupt is left enabled in the eint driver.
>
> Especially for level-sensitive interrupts, this will lead to an
> interrupt storm on resume.
>
> If we detect that an interrupt is only in wake_mask, but not in
> cur_mask, we can just mask it out immediately (as mtk_eint_resume
> would do anyway at a later stage in the resume sequence, when
> restoring cur_mask).
>
> Fixes: bf22ff45bed ("genirq: Avoid unnecessary low level irq function calls")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> index f464f8cd274b75c..737385e86beb807 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static void mtk_eint_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> struct mtk_eint *eint = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> unsigned int status, eint_num;
> - int offset, index, virq;
> + int offset, mask_offset, index, virq;
> void __iomem *reg = mtk_eint_get_offset(eint, 0, eint->regs->stat);
> int dual_edge, start_level, curr_level;
>
> @@ -328,10 +328,24 @@ static void mtk_eint_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> status = readl(reg);
> while (status) {
> offset = __ffs(status);
> + mask_offset = eint_num >> 5;
> index = eint_num + offset;
> virq = irq_find_mapping(eint->domain, index);
> status &= ~BIT(offset);
>
> + /*
> + * If we get an interrupt on pin that was only required
> + * for wake (but no real interrupt requested), mask the
> + * interrupt (as would mtk_eint_resume do anyway later
> + * in the resume sequence).
> + */
> + if (eint->wake_mask[mask_offset] & BIT(offset) &&
> + !(eint->cur_mask[mask_offset] & BIT(offset))) {
> + writel_relaxed(BIT(offset), reg -
> + eint->regs->stat +
> + eint->regs->mask_set);
> + }
> +
> dual_edge = eint->dual_edge[index];
> if (dual_edge) {
> /*
> --
> 2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists