linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] time/tick-broadcast: Fix tick_broadcast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Jun 2019 05:16:30 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        frederic@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time/tick-broadcast: Fix tick_broadcast_offline()
 lockdep complaint

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:55:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:13:36PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > So how about the following patch, which passes very light rcutorture
> > testing but should otherwise be regarded as being under suspicion?
> 
> Looks good to me,
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

Thank you!  But...

> Or, if you want me to apply it, I can do that too ;-)

Last night's rcutorture run was not amused.  Looking into it...

A pair of full hangs at boot (TASKS03 and TREE04), no console output
whatsoever.  Not sure how these changes could cause that, but suspicion
falls on sched_tick_offload_init().  Though even that is a bit strange
because if so, why didn't TREE01 and TREE07 also hang?  Again, looking
into it.

							Thanx, Paul